Skip to content

Tag: 50s

From the LIFE Archive – galleries

I’m always interested in how people are presented in a gallery / museum setting. Even more so now that just handling some of the artworks for a staged photo could cause serious damage, not to mention serious social drama if the wrong – or should I say right people are involved.

Betty Parsons standing in a NYC gallery.
Location: New York, NY, US
Date taken: May 1960
Photographer: Eliot Elisofon


Leo Castelli in his NYC gallery.
Location: New York, NY, US
Date taken: 1960
Photographer: Eliot Elisofon

Leave a Comment

Daniel Rebour: an appreciation

There are artists that you think of when you think of drawing, Pat Steir, Jasper Johns, Jim Dine (I’m still blown away by the “Tool” drawings of the seventies) Jack Kirby (for some) and I’ll throw in an extra one, Daniel Rebour.

Daniel Rebour was a French illustrator. He is best known for drawing bicycles and bike parts. His drawings were published in cycling magazines and catalogs, to my knowledge he never showed in a gallery

However his drawings are extraordinary. His line and detail are unmatched by anything I’ve ever seen – they are also iconic. Rebour’s drawings are the flashpoint of the image of the cycling boom of the early seventies and to this day, they evoke a memory of an earlier and to my eyes, a more human version of bicycle culture.

When I view Rebour’s work I equate the new technological present with a loss of humanity that the early days of cycling held and showed so well. The artist in me views Rebour’s work with envy of his amazing technical and natural skill as well as sadness knowing that artwork like this just isn’t made nor considered relevant anymore.

When I see an adult on a bicycle, I do not despair for the future of the human race. – H.G. Wells

Leave a Comment

Looking In Robert Frank's The Americans

In the late forties and fifties the problem of American art had been in the subject matter – we painted portraits of ourselves when we did not know who we were, we painted landscapes as fast as we could strip mine the forest, we painted indians as fast as we could kill them and in the time of the industrial revolution we painted ourselves as rustics, it had become clear that a unique brand of American art was being discovered – not just in paint and on paper (as well as sculpture) but in a “newer” form – photography.

It is this “Americanism” that becomes really interesting to me. It is clear to everyone that the influx of European artists help turn the art of that time around in a way that was forward thinking, and put to an end the idea of the french school of easel painting. The “American Painters” such as de Kooning and Rothko, who are clearly immigrants, but are considered “American Painters” led this revolution in the painting world, but photographically it was Robert Frank (Swiss) with his publication of The Americans. It is clear that the role of the European immigrant played as big a role in the art of that time as it has played in the role of industrializing the United States as a whole.

With the publishing of The Americans fifty years ago, Frank establishes a new iconography for contemporary photography that is still in use today, bits of bus depots, lunch counters, cars, anonymous faces, movie stars and the land mass of the sea shore and the great plains, in essence “America” is the subject in all of it’s warts and glitter.

In Hollywood, the publication of The Americans would be the end of the story, it’s success celebrated. However this was not to be with The Americans, in fact it was considered a commercial failure. Later with every passing day (or year) a critical drumbeat was being heard and it became obvious that The Americans, with it’s positive and negative views was as complex as the country it was named for. By the 1970’s it was clear the The Americans was the most influential, and the most important book of photography published in the previous 30 years. This personal political approach would become a standard in how we view photography for the years to come.

To bring this full circle, it was Robert Frank that taught us how to see ourselves as “Americans”.

Currently on view at the National Gallery, Looking In, Robert Frank’s The Americans, marks the Fiftieth anniversary of the publication of The Americans, with an exhibit of the book, as well as earlier books and contact sheets from the Frank Archive. I’m thrilled that the show was more than just plowing forward with a linear view of the book (think page one, two, etc), instead it breaks the work into four distinct groups and presents the material in a way that allows for a reading of the work understanding that you will never be able to enforce the linear flow of a book when a show is staged in multiple rooms. The work is as strong and as fresh feeling to me as it was the first time I saw the book in 1983.

Leave a Comment

Superman's sexual fetish revealed

Superman isn’t the only one with a secret. Joe Shuster, the artist who co-created the Man of Steel along with writer Jerry Siegel had one of his own.

In the 1950s, when Shuster and Siegel were fighting with DC Comics to regain the copyright to their character, Shuster was unable get any work. So instead of illustrating the adventures of Lois and Clark, Shuster took to decidedly different sorts of couples in images for Nights of Horror, a fetish magazine sold in Times Square sex shops.

It doesn’t take a huge imagination to look at the cover of Craig Yoe’s upcoming Secret Identity: The Fetish Art of Superman’s Co-creator Joe Shuster (Abrams, $24.95 – Available in April) and picture the young artist getting out his frustrations over what he’d lost, because the faces seem awfully close to those of the most famous famous couple in comics.

Most (if not all) of this is taken from SCI FI wire.com

Leave a Comment

Jonathan Jones on Jasper Johns' Flag

In the Guardian today Jonathan Jones equates Jasper Johns’ Flag painting with The Great American Novel. He very quickly touches base on a number of Meta-naratives that are imposed on the artwork since it’s creation in 1954 or 1955. He argues that the flag paintings are a love or leave em’ kind of thing.

Jones further asks you to Look closer – to experience the work in itself. Mentioning that the original has fragments of headlines and photographs clipped from newspapers, sunk beneath the soft waxen surface of the work. Clearly he is trying to connect a political resonance with current event with the flag artworks – and I think this is interesting and silly at the same time. However after setting up an argument that is somewhat interesting concept he never delivers. I would have loved for Jones to expand his thoughts on The Great American Novel as it relates to the flag paintings. this seems like an opportunity missed.

The Story is here

1 Comment